Blood on the Meadow: The Kashmir Conundrum
India must respond with both strength and wisdom. Swift military and judicial action is imperative to dismantle terror networks and secure Kashmir’s vulnerable zones. Yet, equally vital is a reimagined political strategy—one that builds bridges rather than walls.
By Anwar A. Khan
The bucolic serenity of Kashmir’s Pahalgam Valley was shattered on 22 April 2025, when a brutal act of terror unleashed bloodshed upon innocents. In an attack orchestrated by the Pakistan-backed Resistance Front (TRF)—an offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT)—28 tourists were slaughtered and more than 20 gravely wounded, their only “crime” being their religion.
The attackers, masked in malice and armed with rifles, methodically separated men, women, and children, forcing them to prove their faith like we were forced at gun-points by the savage Pakistani army in 1971 to prove our faith. Those identified as non-Muslims were executed at point-blank range. What unfolded was not mere violence; it was an act of chilling, systematic savagery, a brazen assault not only on individuals but on the very fabric of humanity.
Among the slain were Lieutenant Vinay Narwal, an Indian Navy officer on his honeymoon; Bitan Adhikari, a U.S.-based technology professional visiting with his family; Shailesh Kalathiya, a Gujarat banker; and Pune businessman Santosh Jagdale. Their deaths, seared into the nation’s consciousness, epitomize the vulnerability that haunts Kashmir even in its most peaceful corners.
A Region on Edge
This massacre underscores a dangerous shift in Kashmir’s long, fraught relationship with violence. Since the bloody partition of British India in 1947, Kashmir has been a contested, divided land—claimed in full by both India and Pakistan, yet riven apart by borders, wars, and insurgencies. Following India’s revocation of Jammu and Kashmir’s special constitutional status in 2019, a fragile calm had prevailed. However, the fear of demographic and cultural erosion festered, allowing terror outfits to exploit the resentments simmering beneath the surface.
The timing of this attack—amid high-profile international visits, including that of U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Prime Minister Modi’s diplomatic trip to Saudi Arabia—betrays its calculated intent: to humiliate India on the world stage and destabilize the region ahead of the sacred Amarnath Yatra.
In retaliation, New Delhi swiftly responded: closing vital trade corridors, expelling Pakistani diplomats, and further curtailing already restricted visas. In an extraordinary step, India also suspended its role in the Indus Water Treaty, a landmark 1960 agreement governing river waters vital to millions across both nations. Islamabad’s reaction was equally furious—halting trade, sealing its airspace, and condemning India’s measures as politically motivated provocations.
Beyond diplomatic maneuvers lies a deeper human tragedy. Across India—from Ranchi to Bengaluru to Jaipur—the remains of the Pahalgam martyrs were received with tears, outrage, and solemn reverence. In Pune, young Asavari Jagdale led her father’s funeral procession, her clothes still stained with the blood of horror witnessed. In Jaipur, the Udhwani family buried a beloved son, struggling to comprehend the senselessness of their loss.
Each funeral procession was not just a farewell—it was a searing indictment of the forces that perpetuate terror under the guise of ideology. India’s collective grief has metamorphosed into an unrelenting demand: that justice be swift, thorough, and absolute.
The Political Reckoning
Yet, mourning alone is not enough. The Pahalgam massacre forces India to confront painful truths. The attack was not merely a lapse of security; it was an eruption of deeper, unresolved grievances. Kashmir’s complete integration into India cannot be achieved solely through military might or administrative edicts. True peace requires nurturing a sense of belonging among Kashmir’s people, addressing their fears, and affirming their dignity.
Failure to do so risks alienating a generation and allowing militant ideologies to fester anew. Policymakers must tread a difficult path—balancing decisive action against terrorists while ensuring that the larger Kashmiri population does not feel besieged or disenfranchised.
Alarmingly, there is an emerging risk that the tragedy could deepen communal fissures elsewhere in India. Reports of threats against Kashmiri students and surging Islamophobic rhetoric are ominous signs. Hatred begets only more hatred. To give in to sectarian impulses would be to dishonor the memory of those lost and to undermine India’s pluralistic foundations.
Adding fuel to this perilous moment, Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar disgracefully canonized the attackers as “freedom fighters.” This grotesque distortion of truth not only desecrates the memory of the dead but also lays bare an ethical bankruptcy of staggering proportions.
Terrorism draped in the guise of patriotism remains terror. No cause—however noble its claim—can justify the cold-blooded murder of innocents. To sanctify such barbarism is not just a diplomatic affront; it is an unforgivable crime against civilization itself.
History will be unforgiving to those who glorify butchery. Silence from the international community at this juncture would be complicity. There must be unequivocal condemnation, not only of the Pahalgam attack but also of the poisonous rhetoric that seeks to elevate murderers into martyrs.
The Road Ahead
India must respond with both strength and wisdom. Swift military and judicial action is imperative to dismantle terror networks and secure Kashmir’s vulnerable zones. Yet, equally vital is a reimagined political strategy—one that builds bridges rather than walls.
A future of lasting peace in Kashmir hinges on addressing the political, cultural, and economic aspirations of its people. Infrastructure development, educational investment, cultural preservation, and genuine political representation must form the pillars of a new Kashmir strategy.
Simultaneously, India must amplify its global campaign to expose Pakistan’s sponsorship of terrorism, compelling the world to hold Islamabad accountable. No nation should be allowed to nourish terror while proclaiming innocence with sanctimonious duplicity.
The blood-soaked meadows of Pahalgam cry out for justice, but they also whisper a deeper yearning—for a future where such horror is unthinkable, where valleys known for their beauty are not defiled by the stench of death. The bereaved families, in their grief, have issued a silent plea to the nation: Make this the last time.
To truly honour the lives lost, India must not only bring the perpetrators to justice but also heal the wounds of Kashmir with compassion, inclusivity, and steadfast determination, reaffirming its commitment to unity and peace.
Only then can the rivers of Kashmir run free, not with blood, but with the promise of enduring peace.
View are personal and IAR neither endorses nor are responsible for them.
